Does Raft have any performance disadvantage compared to Paxos?
In steady state (after leader election), both converge to similar message counts and latency. Raft may be slightly slower during leader changes because it uses election timeouts rather than Paxos's immediate recovery. For most systems that change leaders rarely, this difference is negligible compared to the debugging time saved.
Answered in
Why Raft Won: Consensus Built for HumansPaxos is correct but hard to understand; Raft made consensus explicit. Same guarantees, different adoption. Why comprehensibility matters in algorithms.
Read the full analysisOther questions this article answers
More system design questions
- Why doesn't Google just run Dijkstra faster?
- What is a shortcut edge and when is it precomputed?
- How much space do shortcut edges take compared to the original graph?
- Can Contraction Hierarchies handle dynamic graphs like traffic or road closure?
- Why contract low-degree nodes first instead of high-degree ones?
- What is a CRDT and why does it matter for real-time collaboration?
- How do CRDTs handle concurrent edits without a central server referee?
- Why did Figma move from operational transforms to CRDTs?
Every answer on Crashtech is written by the editor of the article it comes from — never auto-summarised. Browse all answers or the System Design beat.