How do you lock a skip list for concurrent inserts without rotations blocking readers?
Each node has a lock only on its forward pointers, not the node itself. An inserter locks the predecessor pointers it will modify, inserts at the base level, then unlocks before promoting—readers never block on insertion. Compare this to tree rotations, which need to lock multiple parent-child relationships simultaneously. The simplicity is why lock-free skip list implementations (CAS loops, no mutexes) are so much more practical than lock-free trees.
Answered in
Skip Lists: The Shortcut Nobody RotatesBalanced trees rebalance with rotations. Skip lists layer express lanes with random promotion—same O(log n) search, simpler locking.
Read the full analysisOther questions this article answers
More system design questions
- Why does an index's internal data structure matter if it all ends up 'faster than a scan'?
- Why is disk I/O the thing index structures are actually optimizing for?
- Why can't a hash index handle range queries?
- What makes a bitmap index different from a B-tree, and when is it better?
- Why do B-trees stay balanced automatically as data is inserted?
- Why does a database need an index at all — why can't it just scan the table?
- When is a hash index better than a B-tree index?
- What is a composite index and why does column order matter?
Every answer on Crashtech is written by the editor of the article it comes from — never auto-summarised. Browse all answers or the System Design beat.