What's the practical difference between pessimistic and optimistic concurrency control?
Pessimistic control locks a row before touching it, so conflicting transactions wait — safe by construction, but you pay for locks even when conflicts are rare. Optimistic control lets everyone proceed unlocked and checks for conflicts at commit time, retrying the loser — fast under low contention, but wasteful and retry-heavy under high contention. The right choice depends on how often two transactions actually collide.
Answered in
Database Transactions Explained: ACID, Isolation Levels, and Concurrency ControlWhat ACID actually guarantees, and how pessimistic vs optimistic concurrency control decide whether your app locks or retries under load.
Read the full analysisOther questions this article answers
More system design questions
- Why does a database need an index at all — why can't it just scan the table?
- When is a hash index better than a B-tree index?
- What is a composite index and why does column order matter?
- What's a covering index and why is it faster than a normal index?
- What's the real cost of adding an index, beyond disk space?
- What does ACID actually stand for, and why do all four properties matter together?
- What is a race condition in a database transaction, and how does isolation prevent it?
- Why would a database ever allow a weaker isolation level than Serializable?
Every answer on Crashtech is written by the editor of the article it comes from — never auto-summarised. Browse all answers or the System Design beat.